11th September 2015


Akenhead J. in the TCC has held that the provision of little or no information in a pre-trial review questionnaire amounted to substantive non-compliance rather than just minor procedural non-compliance. An unless order had been made requiring the Defendant to file and serve a completed pre-trial review questionnaire by a certain date.

The Defendant lodged a listing questionnaire which contained little or no substantive information to assist the court (in particular in relation to expert and factual evidence). In granting the Claimant’s application for judgment following automatic strike out of the defence, the Judge stated that this had been an important non-compliance by the Defendant. Pre-trial reviews in the TCC were important occasions at which the court makes final decisions about the trial. Accordingly, as a result of the substantive non-compliance by the Defendant, the sanction of automatic strike out of the defence applied and the Claimant was entitled to judgment.

Ron Chatterjee, instructed by Beale & Co, represented the successful claimant.

Read the full judgment here.

Register for updates

Subscribe to our regular newsletters, bulletins and case updates relating to our core areas of expertise.

Register

Would you like to
 know more?

For help and advice talk to a member of our clerking team. They can advise on the best options for your matter.

Call: +44 (0) 20 7842 5555

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Search

Shortlist close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to email this list.